New York Times, February 27, 2013
Voting Rights Law Draws Skepticism From Justices By Adam Liptak
WASHINGTON — A central provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 may be in peril, judging from tough questioning on Wednesday from the Supreme Court’s more conservative members.
If the court overturns the provision, nine states, mostly in the South, would become free to change voting procedures without first getting permission from federal officials…
…Justice Antonin Scalia said the law, once a civil rights landmark, now amounted to a “perpetuation of racial entitlement.”
(with apologies to Calvin Trillin and Dorothy Parker)
If MLK were still in the fight,
no doubt he’d know it isn’t right,
to give the blahs advantage.
He’d proudly see it just and true,
to back Scalia and his crew.
For they like him believe
in equal rights for ALL.
Unlike those nasty Democrats,
they’re crazier than rabid bats!
Every one a panderer,
and also, too, you know it’s true,
we’ve ALWAYS been at war with Oceania.